Insights
What Is My Ideal Weight for My Height? The Four Formulas Doctors Use (2026)
Type "ideal weight" into a search engine and you will find dozens of answers, because there are four competing medical formulas — Devine, Robinson, Miller and Hamwi — and they disagree with each other by several kilograms. That disagreement is the honest answer: your "ideal" weight is a range, not a number. This guide explains what each formula actually says, shows the ranges by height, and covers when the number genuinely does not matter. To get all four results for your own height instantly, use the ideal weight calculator.
The four formulas, explained
All four use the same structure: a base weight for 5 feet of height, plus an increment for every inch above it, with different values for men and women.
| Formula | Men | Women | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Devine (1974) | 50 kg + 2.3 kg/inch over 5 ft | 45.5 kg + 2.3 kg/inch | Built for calculating drug doses; now the clinical default |
| Robinson (1983) | 52 kg + 1.9 kg/inch | 49 kg + 1.7 kg/inch | Refinement of Devine from insurance data |
| Miller (1983) | 56.2 kg + 1.41 kg/inch | 53.1 kg + 1.36 kg/inch | Another refinement; kindest to shorter people |
| Hamwi (1964) | 48 kg + 2.7 kg/inch | 45.5 kg + 2.2 kg/inch | The original quick rule for clinicians |
Why the formulas disagree
None of these came from studying what weight makes people healthiest. Devine's formula was invented so hospital pharmacists could estimate lean body weight for drug dosing; Hamwi's was a bedside shortcut from the 1960s; Robinson and Miller re-fitted the numbers against actuarial tables. Because each was built for a different purpose from different data, they diverge — most at very short and very tall heights. The spread between them is typically 3–7 kg, which is exactly why a single "ideal weight" figure is false precision.
Ideal weight by height: a quick table
The span of all four formulas, rounded — treat these as midpoints of a healthy range, not targets:
| Height | Men (kg / lb) | Women (kg / lb) |
|---|---|---|
| 5′2″ (157 cm) | 51–59 / 112–130 | 49–56 / 108–123 |
| 5′5″ (165 cm) | 57–63 / 126–139 | 54–60 / 119–132 |
| 5′8″ (173 cm) | 64–68 / 141–150 | 59–64 / 130–141 |
| 5′11″ (180 cm) | 70–73 / 154–161 | 64–69 / 141–152 |
| 6′2″ (188 cm) | 77–81 / 170–179 | 69–75 / 152–165 |
For your exact height — in cm or feet-and-inches — the calculator shows each formula's result side by side in both kg and lb.
The BMI healthy range: a better frame
A more useful way to think about weight is the BMI healthy range: the weights that put you between BMI 18.5 and 24.9. At 5′9″ that is roughly 57 to 76 kg — a 19 kg window, all of it considered healthy. Notice how much wider that is than any formula's single answer. If your weight sits inside the BMI range, chasing a formula's precise number has no health payoff. Check where you fall with the BMI calculator.
When the number should not worry you
- You lift weights or play sport. Muscle is denser than fat; every height-only formula reads muscular people as "over" their ideal. Waist measurement and body-fat percentage are better signals.
- You have a large or small frame. Wrist and shoulder structure shift healthy weight by several kilograms in either direction.
- You are over 65. Some research links slightly higher BMI with better outcomes in older adults; unintentional weight loss is often the bigger warning sign.
- The trend is good. Direction beats position: moving from BMI 31 to 28 is a major health win even though 28 is still "overweight" on paper.
Use the formulas the way clinicians do — as a rough reference point — and judge progress by how the range, your waistline and your energy move together, not by a single number invented for drug dosing half a century ago. For anything beyond general reference, a doctor or dietitian who can see your full picture beats every formula.
FAQ
Sources
The rates, thresholds and rules in this article come from the following primary sources. Figures change at Budgets and new tax years — check the source for the latest.